Tag: paradigms

As I promised, I’ve been working on verb paradigms. As of now, they’re up and running. Just search for any Latin word and click “see the complete paradigm”.

Most verbs show up just fine, but of course some irregular verbs will show odd glitches. Therefore the data is “beta” but the paradigms should still prove helpful.

Here are some caveats:

• certain irregular verbs will have weird forms, for instance, the participles for esse (which didn’t exist until late antiquity).
• deponent verbs will show active forms. Remember that deponent verbs do have active participles, and the imperfect subjunctive is formed from the “reconstructed” active infinitive. I’m trying to imagine a way to “gray-out” the unused active forms, but I haven’t decided fully on that yet.
• as a result of deponent verbs having “active” forms, they are now stored in the dictionary in their active forms, although on flashcards they will still show their deponent forms. So for instance sequor will be searchable under sequo.
• unusual forms, such as dic, duc, and fac will show up as dice, duce, and face. I haven’t implemented and “irregular forms” system yet, even though I’ve half mapped it out. UPDATE: It turns out that Plautus was fond of using forms like dice, duce, and face even though they were later rejected by Terence.
• UPDATE: Some forms which are not known to exist (in other words, we don’t have a record of them) but can logically be deduced will show up on the paradigm charts. For instance, the rare future active participle of volo, voliturus shows up and so does it’s non-extant future active infinitive voliturus esse. Many grammar books will not show these forms simply because we don’t have a record of them. Nonetheless, it is logical to assume they existed or would have been known to exist during Roman times (at least in theory).

So, work continues! Enjoy.